Rev 446 | Blame | Last modification | View Log | RSS feed
=== SVARCOM vs FREECOM ===
SvarCOM is a DOS command interpreter (shell), similar to COMMAND.COM in MS-DOS
and FreeCOM in FreeDOS. But why not using FreeCOM in the first place?
The FreeCOM project is an impressive piece of software, but there are a few
things that I do not like about it. SvarCOM is my attempt at addressing these
things through a completely new implementation. SvarCOM is composed of
entirely original code and does not borrow any code from MS-DOS or FreeCOM.
=== MEMORY FOOTPRINT =========================================================
FreeCOM is not suitable for low-memory machines. It takes about 55K of
conventional memory when XMS is unavailable. XMS being a 386+ thing, FreeCOM
is a poor fit for pre-386 machines. There is the KSSF hack, but it is a kludge
with many limitations. As pointed out by one of the FreeCOM authors, FreeCOM
is designed with 21'st century machines in mind and not IBM PC compatibles.
SvarCOM does not rely on XMS and performs runtime swapping that works on any
IBM PC compatible machine.
=== NLS RESSOURCES ===========================================================
FreeCOM requires custom NLS ressources. While the vast majority of FreeDOS
programs use a single "standard" (CATS), FreeCOM uses a different approach
with NLS strings built into the binary. This makes it necessary to distribute
as many binary blobs as there are supported languages. Another consequence is
that FreeCOM is unable to switch its language dynamically (ie. following
changes made to the LANG environment variable). It also makes the translation
more difficult.
SvarCOM uses CATS-style translations in a precompiled form and supports
dynamic language changes through the %LANG% environment variable.
=== CODE COMPLEXITY ==========================================================
FreeCOM is a complex beast: it aims for compatibility with multiple compilers
and supports many embedded features. This makes the code uneasy to follow and
changes require careful testing on all supported compilers and all possible
build variants.
SvarCOM, on the other hand, is meant to be simple and universal. It is
compiled with OpenWatcom only, which makes a ton of IFDEF's go away. It also
does not integrate extra features that can be reasonably implemented through
external tools (typically: DOSKEY). It strives to reimplement the baseline
functionality of MS-DOS 5/6.
=== NON-FREE LICENSE =========================================================
FreeCOM code is released under the terms of a license that restrains the
freedom of its users due to its virality (GPL).
SvarCOM is released under the terms of a liberal and permissive (MIT) license
that does not impose limitations on how users may or may not use the software.
====================================================================== EOF ===