Subversion Repositories SvarDOS

Rev

Rev 440 | Go to most recent revision | Details | Compare with Previous | Last modification | View Log | RSS feed

Rev Author Line No. Line
395 mateuszvis 1
 
446 mateuszvis 2
                         === SVARCOM vs FREECOM ===
395 mateuszvis 3
 
4
 
5
The FreeCOM project is an impressive piece of software, but there are a few
6
things that I do not like about it. SvarCOM is my attempt at addressing these
7
things.
8
 
9
 
446 mateuszvis 10
=== MEMORY FOOTPRINT =========================================================
395 mateuszvis 11
 
12
FreeCOM is not suitable for low-memory machines. It takes about 55K of
13
conventional memory when XMS is unavailable. XMS being a 386+ thing, FreeCOM
14
is a poor fit for pre-386 machines. There is the KSSF hack, but it is a kludge
15
with many limitations. As pointed out by one of the FreeCOM authors, FreeCOM
16
is designed with 21'st century machines in mind and not IBM PC compatibles.
17
 
18
SvarDOS does not rely on XMS and performs runtime swapping that works on any
19
IBM PC compatible machine.
20
 
21
 
446 mateuszvis 22
=== NLS RESSOURCES ===========================================================
395 mateuszvis 23
 
440 mateuszvis 24
FreeCOM requires custom NLS ressources. While the vast majority of FreeDOS
25
programs use a single "standard" (CATS), FreeCOM uses a different approach
26
with NLS strings built into the binary. This makes it necessary to distribute
27
as many binary blobs as there are supported languages. Another consequence is
28
that FreeCOM is unable to switch its language dynamically (ie. following
29
changes made to the LANG environment variable). It also makes the translation
30
more difficult.
395 mateuszvis 31
 
440 mateuszvis 32
SvarDOS uses CATS-style translations in a precompiled form and loads the
33
strings that match the LANG variable.
395 mateuszvis 34
 
35
 
446 mateuszvis 36
=== CODE COMPLEXITY ==========================================================
395 mateuszvis 37
 
38
FreeCOM is a complex beast: it aims for compatibility with multiple compilers
39
and supports many embedded features. This makes the code uneasy to follow and
40
changes require careful testing on all supported compilers and all possible
41
build variants.
42
 
440 mateuszvis 43
SvarDOS, on the other hand, is meant to be simple and universal. It is
44
compiled with OpenWatcom only, which makes a ton of IFDEF's go away. It also
45
does not integrate extra features that can be reasonably implemented through
46
external tools (typically: DOSKEY). It strives to reimplement the baseline
47
functionality of MS-DOS 5/6.
395 mateuszvis 48
 
49
 
446 mateuszvis 50
=== NON-FREE LICENSE =========================================================
395 mateuszvis 51
 
52
FreeCOM code is released under the terms of a license that restrains the
53
freedom of its users due to its virality (GPL).
54
 
55
SvarCOM is released under the terms of a liberal and permissive (MIT) license
56
that does not impose limitations on how users may or may not use it.
57
 
58
 
446 mateuszvis 59
====================================================================== EOF ===