Subversion Repositories SvarDOS

Rev

Rev 674 | Go to most recent revision | Details | Last modification | View Log | RSS feed

Rev Author Line No. Line
288 mateuszvis 1
 
2
        %h*** Why would I want to use SvarDOS instead of FreeDOS? ***
3
 
4
The FreeDOS project is a free, open-source operating system that aims to be
5
100%% compatible with MS-DOS. And it is awesome. So why would I want to use
6
SvarDOS instead?
7
 
8
%hLong release cycles
9
 
10
The FreeDOS project began 29 June 1994. Version 1.0 came around in 2006.
11
Version 1.1 has been released in 2012, and the version 1.2 followed in
12
December 2016. This translates roughly to a 5-years release cycle. Granted,
13
the DOS scene is not as active as it used to be, but still, many things happen
14
during a few years. Such version-centric approach also requires users to
15
perform full-system upgrades every now and then.
16
 
17
SvarDOS is very different in this regard: there are no versions at all.
18
Whenever a new program is included into or updated within the distribution, it
19
becomes immediately available through the SvarDOS reposoitory and may be
20
pulled either through the SvarDOS website or SvarDOS' pkgnet tool. Already
21
installed systems can be easily kept up-to-date using the distribution's
22
package manager.
23
 
24
%hConstraints of legal nature
25
 
26
The FreeDOS project mimicks a proprietary operating system, with all its APIs
27
and peculiarities. For this reason, the project always had to be extremely
28
careful about what can and what cannot be included within the FreeDOS
29
distribution. As a result, only "free software" (as in freedom, think GPL,
30
BSD, and so on) can make its way into the official distribution. While such
31
cautious approach is sane and legally safe, it is far from practical for
32
users. Allowing exclusively free software means that a high number of useful
33
programs, tools and games are left behind. For example "freeware" tools (as in
34
"gratis but no source included") are a no-go. Even open-source programs can be
35
rejected, if they do not clearly state that they comply with an OSI-approved
36
license.
37
 
38
SvarDOS, on the other hand, is much more liberal about including packages.
39
Basically, anything that is objectively useful, of reasonable quality,
40
free/gratis and can be legally distributed in the form of a package, can be
41
included in SvarDOS. The only exception is for the "core" system (ie. the
42
operating system itself), which must be based exclusively on free/libre
43
software. Read more about %lpkgrules.ama:SvarDOS package inclusion rules%t.
44
 
45
%hFreeDOS included!
46
 
47
It must be noted, that altough the goals of SvarDOS and FreeDOS may be
48
slightly different, SvarDOS wouldn't exist without FreeDOS. Indeed, SvarDOS
49
uses the excellent FreeDOS kernel, as well as a few other utilities borrowed
50
from the FreeDOS ecosystem.
51
 
52
Read also: %lhistory.ama:SvarDOS history